Hello!
Can one verify the following output?
S(2000) mod 10**18 = 2462929609139498
S(5000) mod 10**18 = 15414831967692351
S(10000) mod 10**18 = 61690942682501005
S(15000) mod 10**18 = 138829549429286488
S(20000) mod 10**18 = 246832459609482811
Thanks.
Problem 320
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
In particular don't post any code fragments or results.
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
- sfabriz
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:18 am
- Location: London - UK
Re: Problem 320
S(2000): 2462929609139498
S(5000): 15414831967692351
S(10000): 61690942682501005
S(15000): 138829549429286488
S(20000): 246832459609482811
S(5000): 15414831967692351
S(10000): 61690942682501005
S(15000): 138829549429286488
S(20000): 246832459609482811

-
StatujaLeha
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:08 pm
Re: Problem 320
Thanks, sfabriz. Just solved it. The problem was in implementaion, not in algorithm.
-
wraith
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:27 pm
Re: Problem 320
Could you share some times and code lengths?
My current solution in Mathematica (running as I write this here) would probably take an hour to complete. It's probably the longest program I've ever written in Mathematica too. It took me a lot of time to write... probably 7 hours but it's the best I could think of.
It finds S(1000) for about 14 seconds, S(2000) for about 30, and so on.
I'm surely missing something here...
My current solution in Mathematica (running as I write this here) would probably take an hour to complete. It's probably the longest program I've ever written in Mathematica too. It took me a lot of time to write... probably 7 hours but it's the best I could think of.
It finds S(1000) for about 14 seconds, S(2000) for about 30, and so on.
I'm surely missing something here...
-
StatujaLeha
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:08 pm
Re: Problem 320
39 non-empty lines inluding code to generate primes and without imports in Python. Running time is about 140 seconds in Core i7 860.
-
carkiller
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: Problem 320
Hi there,
I'm so sure that my solution is correct, but still I don't get the S(1000) correctly (I get 612483945066403). I even checked the first few values in J and they fulfill what I understood as the condition.
It would be great if someone could tell me if my first numbers are correct. Did I just miss a point in the Problem?
I'm so sure that my solution is correct, but still I don't get the S(1000) correctly (I get 612483945066403). I even checked the first few values in J and they fulfill what I understood as the condition.
It would be great if someone could tell me if my first numbers are correct. Did I just miss a point in the Problem?
- 10 9876543150
11 19753086300
12 32098765220
13 44444444140
14 58024690948
75 3237037008985
125 9223456708641
-
wraith
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:27 pm
Re: Problem 320
Here are my solution for the same numbers:
Not quite the same...
Code: Select all
{{10, 9876543150}, {11, 22222222100}, {12, 34567901050}, {13, 49382715779}, {14, 64197530508}, {75, 3312345654609}, {125, 9372839434369}}-
carkiller
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: Problem 320
Thanks to your numbers, wraith, I've found the error. Programming only, algorithm worked. I just gave a silly parameter and therefore an array was cut too short.
It is much, much easier when a wrong number is known!
So, finally, I get the right answer soon. YEAH!
Marco.
It is much, much easier when a wrong number is known!
So, finally, I get the right answer soon. YEAH!
Marco.
-
mdean
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 2:05 am
Re: Problem 320
I seem to be having an issue on this problem. I'm getting the correct answer for S(1000), but my answer is not being accepted for S(1,000,000). I've double and triple-checked my constants and created 3 extra loops to verify values used to calculate N(1,000,000). All 3 loops cleared without reporting an incorrect value. The next step is to run the verification for every value from 10 to 1,000,000. Not sure how much run-time this will add.
What are the chances the accepted answer is incorrect?
Update: Apparently, the values for i = 1,000,000 were correct. Unfortunately, the values for i = 4,239 were not. Hmm... Time to track this down...
What are the chances the accepted answer is incorrect?
Update: Apparently, the values for i = 1,000,000 were correct. Unfortunately, the values for i = 4,239 were not. Hmm... Time to track this down...
