Problem 355
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
In particular don't post any code fragments or results.
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
-
Duality
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 4:30 am
Problem 355
Anyone have any advice? No matter what I do to this problem, I'm always looking at disgustingly huge runtimes.
I understand some basic requirements of every element in the solution set, but getting the right numbers is eluding me. I could really use a push in the right direction as to how to shorten this thing down.
I understand some basic requirements of every element in the solution set, but getting the right numbers is eluding me. I could really use a push in the right direction as to how to shorten this thing down.
-
eppie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:19 pm
Re: Problem 355
I was struggleing with some long ruetines, but I think I have an efficient one now. It gets the right results for 10, 30, and 100, but not for 200000. (runs about 7.5 sec) Could someone who answered this give a clue for some higher values of n= 1000 and 5000 maybe? I don't know where I'm going wrong.
Thanks for the clues.
Thanks for the clues.
- hk
- Administrator
- Posts: 12832
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:34 am
- Location: Haren, Netherlands
Re: Problem 355
I'm having difficulty with people starting to ask for more clues than are given when the problem is less than 48 hours old and there are still less than 50 people who have solved it.
Please remember that the first 50 to solve the problem get rewarded points for the Eulerian table.
Please have the patience to wait until the first 50 are in; or if that takes a long time, have the patience to find a better algoritm.
Please remember that the first 50 to solve the problem get rewarded points for the Eulerian table.
Please have the patience to wait until the first 50 are in; or if that takes a long time, have the patience to find a better algoritm.

War ruins the life and health of untold numbers of innocent children.
-
eppie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:19 pm
Re: Problem 355
Sorry If I jumped the gun here. I don't really play for points for anything, I just thought I had a good algorithm that didn't work. I'll wait a while. If I don't solve it before it's long in the history books, I'll see if someone has some tips then.
-
tagdus
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:08 pm
Re: Problem 355
Hi everybody!
This is my first post about Project Euler problems.
I was trying to verify Co(30) and Co(100) from the problem definition.
With pen and paper i came out with this for Co(30):
Co(30) = 1+16+27+25+7+11+13+17+19+23+29 = 188
They are all coprime, and between 1 and 30.
The sum should be 193 as stated in the problem.
What am I doing wrong? Where's the error? Any hint will be appreciated! Thanks.
SDV
This is my first post about Project Euler problems.
I was trying to verify Co(30) and Co(100) from the problem definition.
With pen and paper i came out with this for Co(30):
Co(30) = 1+16+27+25+7+11+13+17+19+23+29 = 188
They are all coprime, and between 1 and 30.
The sum should be 193 as stated in the problem.
What am I doing wrong? Where's the error? Any hint will be appreciated! Thanks.
SDV
-
mynameisalreadytaken
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:20 pm
-
tagdus
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:08 pm
-
LarryBlake
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:49 pm
Re: Problem 355
For 10000, I get 5972754. I don't know if this is correct, because my final answer isn't. If anyone would like to talk about my strategy offline, I'd appreciate it.

-
guptavis
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:47 pm
Re: Problem 355
Co(30) = 1+27+25+11+13+17+19+23+29 +28= 193tagdus wrote: Co(30) = 1+16+27+25+7+11+13+17+19+23+29 = 188
What am I doing wrong? Where's the error? Any hint will be appreciated! Thanks.
replace 16+7 by 28. How to generalise this? I have no idea!
- Marcus_Andrews
- Administrator
- Posts: 1637
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:23 pm
Re: Problem 355
I don't want to give anything away, but I'd just say that it would be a good idea to remember what it really means for numbers to be coprime. If every number in a solution set is coprime, then there is a certain fundamental requirement in place. Check some attributes of the solution set you've just made.guptavis wrote:Co(30) = 1+27+25+11+13+17+19+23+29 +28= 193tagdus wrote: Co(30) = 1+16+27+25+7+11+13+17+19+23+29 = 188
What am I doing wrong? Where's the error? Any hint will be appreciated! Thanks.
replace 16+7 by 28. How to generalise this? I have no idea!
Based on that requirement, you can take a more bottom-up approach to this problem and more adequately assess which numbers are better candidates for placement in the solution list.
-
ozturkfa
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:37 am
Re: Problem 355
Hi
What is the set for Co(100)?
This may help me to find my algorithms problem.
Thanks for your interest
What is the set for Co(100)?
This may help me to find my algorithms problem.
Thanks for your interest
-
ozturkfa
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:37 am
Re: Problem 355
Hi
I find the set
co(100)={100, 99, 97, 91, 89, 83, 79, 73, 71, 67, 61, 59, 53, 47, 43, 41, 37, 31, 29, 23, 19, 17, 1}
But the sum is 1310 "the problem states that it should be 1356".
What is wrong with this set?
I find the set
co(100)={100, 99, 97, 91, 89, 83, 79, 73, 71, 67, 61, 59, 53, 47, 43, 41, 37, 31, 29, 23, 19, 17, 1}
But the sum is 1310 "the problem states that it should be 1356".
What is wrong with this set?
-
TripleM
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:31 am
Re: Problem 355
The only thing wrong with that set is that there is another set with a greater sum, and you're asked to find the maximal sum.
-
ozturkfa
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:37 am
Re: Problem 355
The only thing i learned from TripleM's reply is nothing.
Thanks TripleM.
Is giving Co(100)'s set considered to be a kind of cheating?
Interesting...
Who cares!
I can find it anyway...
Thanks TripleM.
Is giving Co(100)'s set considered to be a kind of cheating?
Interesting...
Who cares!
I can find it anyway...
- hk
- Administrator
- Posts: 12832
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:34 am
- Location: Haren, Netherlands
Re: Problem 355
If we had considered giving the set for C(100) a good idea we would have done so in the problem statement.
As we haven't done so we obviously did not think that a good idea.
So why should it be given here upon your request?
As we haven't done so we obviously did not think that a good idea.
So why should it be given here upon your request?

War ruins the life and health of untold numbers of innocent children.
-
ozturkfa
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:37 am
Re: Problem 355
OK
It is not that much important( and informative).
Thanks for your interest anyway.
It is not that much important( and informative).
Thanks for your interest anyway.
