Problem 289

A place to air possible concerns or difficulties in understanding ProjectEuler problems. This forum is not meant to publish solutions. This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods or giving hints how a problem can be solved.
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.

This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.

In particular don't post any code fragments or results.

Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems

Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem

Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one


See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
quilan
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:08 pm

Re: Problem 289

Post by quilan »

Your post wasn't what piqued my curiosity really, it was more the fact previously there's been about 1 solver per day over the past weeks, yet this weekend popped up 18-20 in a row. It was just odd behavior to see.
ex ~100%'er... until the gf came along.
Image
quintana
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 5:53 pm

Re: Problem 289

Post by quintana »

@quilan

nothing strange with number of solvers, when you take into consideration all those who work together on very well known website...ok, one or two of them, and bunch of cretins who copy/paste answers. so, don't hate the playa, hate the game!
harryh
Posts: 2091
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:33 pm
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece

Re: Problem 289

Post by harryh »

Don't hate anything /anyone, is what I would suggest. :)

Imho, whatever someone or some people do to submit an answer (cooperating or copy-pasting or whatever) does not affect at all the quality of the problems, the insights one gets through researching their essence and the pleasure of finding an efficient approach to a solution.

So, please, let each one of us concentrate on maximising whatever it is we get out of these problems and these forums; let us avoid flame wars, accusations and counter-accusations. There are plenty of other places in the web (and in the real world) where people fight each other. Do we need to turn this site into another arena?
quintana
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 5:53 pm

Re: Problem 289

Post by quintana »

merely explaining the numbers to quilan. no reply - no flame war, that's me motto.
quilan
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:08 pm

Re: Problem 289

Post by quilan »

Yup, no hating here either, just made me "O.o" when I saw it the other morning.
ex ~100%'er... until the gf came along.
Image
User avatar
hk
Administrator
Posts: 12832
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:34 am
Location: Haren, Netherlands

Re: Problem 289

Post by hk »

As zwuupeape formulated it very nicely: "this weird coincidence was bound to occur. ".
If you read between the lines you will know enough.
Image
War ruins the life and health of untold numbers of innocent children.
sivakd
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:37 am
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Re: Problem 289

Post by sivakd »

quilan wrote: I'll be honest, I'm rather baffled by it. You can pretty much draw all 37 of the (2,2) scenarios by brute force on a piece of paper, and that should give all the information needed really... I didn't even blink for this one, whereas others had me stumped for a while.
Hmm, so far I had been lazy and afraid (of making mistakes) to manually draw all those 37 solutions for 2x2. Finally wrote a program to find and plot the shapes. I have been staring at those shapes for more than a day now and still can't figure out how to proceed even though I have spotted a few things. So at this time I tend to think that having the 37 shapes handy isn't going to make this problem automatically easy.
Image
puzzle is a euphemism for lack of clarity
Post Reply