Problem 194

A place to air possible concerns or difficulties in understanding ProjectEuler problems. This forum is not meant to publish solutions. This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods or giving hints how a problem can be solved.
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.

This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.

In particular don't post any code fragments or results.

Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems

Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem

Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one


See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
User avatar
daniel.is.fischer
Posts: 2400
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: Bremen, Germany

Re: new problems ( + clarifications for 194)

Post by daniel.is.fischer »

Tomorrow evening, unless disaster strikes.
Il faut respecter la montagne -- c'est pourquoi les gypaètes sont là.
BjornEdstrom
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:16 pm

Re: new problems ( + clarifications for 194)

Post by BjornEdstrom »

Last problem was 30 May 2008 17:00:00 GMT, so I guess 6 June 21:00:00 GMT.
User avatar
daniel.is.fischer
Posts: 2400
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: Bremen, Germany

Re: new problems ( + clarifications for 194)

Post by daniel.is.fischer »

Good guess :D
Il faut respecter la montagne -- c'est pourquoi les gypaètes sont là.
zwuupeape
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:11 pm

Problem 194

Post by zwuupeape »

I am not certain if my problem is with gluing the units or finding the number of unique configurations for units A and B when they stand alone. Just to make sure I'm wasting my time on the right thing, if anyone could PM me and verify some of my midway results it would be much appreciated - thanks !!
User avatar
daniel.is.fischer
Posts: 2400
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: Bremen, Germany

Re: Problem 194

Post by daniel.is.fischer »

I'll look.
Il faut respecter la montagne -- c'est pourquoi les gypaètes sont là.
agruzdev
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:01 am

Re: Problem 194

Post by agruzdev »

I have solved the problem 194 analyticaly. But, i have trouble with confirmation. How I must print last 8 digits? Simple like this 12345678 ? Or 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ? Or like 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ?
MuthuVeerappanR
Posts: 539
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:30 pm
Location: India
Contact:

Re: Problem 194

Post by MuthuVeerappanR »

Like 12345678
Image
It is not knowledge, but the act of learning, not possession but the act of getting there, which grants the greatest enjoyment.
papadil
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 12:08 am

Re: new problems ( + clarifications for 194)

Post by papadil »

stijn263 wrote: Sat May 17, 2008 11:00 am Daniel, perhaps something like this is more clear:
The compound graph above is an example of a configuration of type (2,2,4), in fact it's a configuration of type (2,2,n) for all n [ge] 4.
Perhaps I'm color blind but I see here a correction was posted. The "above configuration" shows only 4 colors so it should be (2,2,4), but it still says "The compound graph above is an example of a configuration of type (2,2,6)". Nitpicking...sorry.
papadil
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 12:08 am

Re: Problem 194

Post by papadil »

Never mind - I read it again and got the point... it is one example of the many coloring's in the (2,2,6) group.
Post Reply