Let Sm = (x1, x2, ... , xm) be the m-tuple of positive real numbers with x1 + x2 + ... + xm = m for which Pm = x1 * x2^2 * ... * xm^m is maximised.
For example, it can be verified that [P10] = 4112 ([ ] is the integer part function).
I must be misunderstanding this as it seems to be that, for example, S10 = (2, 2, 2, 2, 2) gives P10 = 32768 which is much greater. What am I misreading?
Problem 190
Forum rules
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
As your posts will be visible to the general public you are requested to be thoughtful in not posting anything that might explicitly give away how to solve a particular problem.
This forum is NOT meant to discuss solution methods for a problem.
In particular don't post any code fragments or results.
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
Don't start begging others to give partial answers to problems
Don't ask for hints how to solve a problem
Don't start a new topic for a problem if there already exists one
See also the topics:
Don't post any spoilers
Comments, questions and clarifications about PE problems.
- jaap
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:57 pm
- Contact:
Re: Problem 190
S10 needs to have 10 numbers in it, x1...x10 that sum to 10. You are only using five.Zkid wrote:Let Sm = (x1, x2, ... , xm) be the m-tuple of positive real numbers with x1 + x2 + ... + xm = m for which Pm = x1 * x2^2 * ... * xm^m is maximised.
For example, it can be verified that [P10] = 4112 ([ ] is the integer part function).
I must be misunderstanding this as it seems to be that, for example, S10 = (2, 2, 2, 2, 2) gives P10 = 32768 which is much greater. What am I misreading?
-
Zkid
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 12:09 am
- PropagandaPanda
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:29 am
Re: Problem 190
From what I understand right now, Pm should be an integer since we need to compute its integer partition.
However, it seems that Pm is not an integer. Taking m=2, the simple corresponding function is:
y = x*(2-x)^2
which is maximized for x>0 and (2-x)>0 at (2/3, 32/27 ). 32/27 is not an integer. I must be misunderstanding something.
Thanks.
However, it seems that Pm is not an integer. Taking m=2, the simple corresponding function is:
y = x*(2-x)^2
which is maximized for x>0 and (2-x)>0 at (2/3, 32/27 ). 32/27 is not an integer. I must be misunderstanding something.
Thanks.
- TheEvil
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:38 am
- Location: Szeged, Hungary
Re: Problem 190
The point is, that P_m should not be integer. If your answer (a=32/27) is correct, then you have to take the greatest integer which is less or equal to a, in this case, you should type 1 as a correct answer.

- PropagandaPanda
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:29 am
-
philiplu
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:51 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA, USA
Re: Problem 190
There's a 19 Nov 2013 post by dcterr with 8 kudos but no permanent lock on it in the PE190 forum, and it's only a few posts from being deleted. Can it be made permanent? It's a really good explanation of the theory behind the problem which I refer to occasionally, and I'd hate to see it disappear.
https://projecteuler.net/thread=190;page=5#142817
https://projecteuler.net/thread=190;page=5#142817

- RobertStanforth
- Administrator
- Posts: 2666
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:25 pm

